Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
August Holmgren vs Connor Farren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Holmgren vs Farren analysis and find out who is favored!
August Holmgren vs Connor Farren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Holmgren 2 - 0 Farren
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Holmgren has won 53.69% of points on his second serve, while Farren has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Holmgren, in recent form, has won 43.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Farren has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.65% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Holmgren has saved 57.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Farren has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Holmgren has won 62.16% of matches played (W/L 46/ 28), with Farren winning 42.86% (W/L 3/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Holmgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 101/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 9/ 10). Farren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 191/ 191), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Holmgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.26% of matches (W/L 33/ 20), where as Farren has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 3/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Holmgren winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Holmgren winning 4 and Farren winning 0. The last match between Holmgren and Farren was at the Champaign Challenger, 13-11-2022, Q1 round, I.hard with August Holmgren getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:56.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Holmgren and Farren have played a deciding set 0 times, with Holmgren winning 0 times and Farren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Holmgren winning 0, and Farren 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Holmgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.69 while Farren has played against players with an average rank of 205.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Holmgren has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Farren has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Holmgren has converted 38.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Farren has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
305
Rank
278
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
894
Rank
685
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
66% (156-82)
Career Total W/L
48% (200-214)
48% (11-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,025
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | August Holmgren | Connor Farren |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:56 | 1:21:56 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (62/104) | 64% (95/149) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (50/62) | 68% (65/95) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (27/42) | 35% (19/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (6/18) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (65/149) | 26% (27/104) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
August Holmgren
Player
Connor Farren
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | August Holmgren | Connor Farren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (11/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (26/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (260/264) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.52 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 132 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 76 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:59 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 229.91 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (794/1338) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (588/794) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (286/544) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (44/121) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (500/1401) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (10/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (13/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (13/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 0% (0/0) |
August Holmgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
August Holmgren
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
August Holmgren
74%
(
74 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
106
Total Points Won
86
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Duckhee Lee
Player
August Holmgren
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
August Holmgren
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
39%
(
20 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
16 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
August Holmgren
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
34%
(
20 of
58)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Cash Hanzlik
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
78)
10
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(9) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
August Holmgren
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
8
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
20 of
24)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Alexander Klintcharov
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
August Holmgren
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
0
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
31 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
39 of
105)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Connor Farren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Connor Farren
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Alexander Kotzen
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Braden Shick
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaimee Floyd Angele
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Rudy Quan
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
13
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Ivar Aramburu Contreras
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
A.j. Catanzariti
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Holmgren Vs Farren Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
